Long term bar fine.
#145
Posted 09 September 2011 - 11:10 PM
#146
Posted 09 September 2011 - 11:23 PM
I think perhaps someone's been filling her head full of nonsense or she's something else lined up...FFS it's Pattaya!
#147
Posted 09 September 2011 - 11:26 PM
#148
Posted 09 September 2011 - 11:30 PM
No doubt her salary, LD credits and barfine credit to-date were withheld too, I wonder how close that was to the unpaid barfine that was lost.Check Karl's latest entry on Famous Bar Venue thread.
Meum cerebrum nocet
#149
Posted 09 September 2011 - 11:33 PM
#150
Posted 10 September 2011 - 12:21 AM
You can't blame them for trying it on but if you still have some neurons firing then it can spoil the moment.
#151
Posted 10 September 2011 - 01:11 AM
As far as the original topic, I feel like girls come and go but you're always going to be dealing with the same bar owners, so they would get the hypothetical 300 baht. As you said, some of them own multiple bars, sometimes more than one at a time. why cause trouble?
#152
Posted 10 September 2011 - 11:34 AM
ok, ive just woke up, and some of you are still not getting it, so i,ll try again.
this subject is a discussion for people who DO, or MAY, want to take a girl on holiday with them for a few weeks.
if you have never, or would never, do this, then kindly keep out of it.
people have been reluctant to post the truth, as the phucket possy running to defend jimbo,s honour made it not worth rocking the apple cart for.
hence the poll.
i myself, since you ask have done this many times.
last year was 6 weeks with the same girl, who worked in sally bar.
no payment to sally, she simply stopped work whilst i was in resort, and went back when id gone.
and yes i also went to her baan.
you can ask around.......
free sex in the uk.?
your blinkered view on the world is embarressing.
you live in one of the major red light districts of the world.
you have forgotten what is NOT normal.
do you think my married neighbours walk past bars full of yabba heads on their way to pick the kids up from school.?
60 year old men do not date 18 year olds here.
im pretty sure my dad didnt pay my mum for sex.
it is you that is surounded by jaded old men, expensive divorce behind them saying "you pay anyway".
i am surounded with people who are quite happy with their wives and lives. as they chose a good woman.
and have you forgotten a good woman in the uk pays half of everything.?
on the subject of not giving a fuck about the bars.
i dont.
i dont know if it is narcissism, or naievity that owners think others care about their business,s.
unless these business,s pay to maintain my lifestyle and mortgage, then i dont.! call me old fashioned.
bars close, others open, karl is on his third.
it is a bar.
not the centre of the universe.
unless you dont have many real friends, or much to do, then i suppose it is.
somewhere you can go and have a moan about "that anthony".
from what ive seen, its mostly the alcoholic owners that are actually present in the bars anyway. access to a cheap supply and all that.
all the rest have got bored, and left a fat mamasan in place who thinks she is important, and a cashier that cant add up three beers on a calculator without fucking it up.
so again, if this topic of long term fines is not relevant to yourself, just keep out of it.
it is relevant to me and the rest of the TOURISTS.
Errrrrrrm you were the one who brought up the subject of free sex in one of your previous posts that I really can't be arsed to go back and look up. You really do have your knickers in a twist over this don't you.
Phuket posse ronning to Jim's defence- where? if you could be arsed to go and read back the examples I used of long term bar fines were PATTAYA bars- as far as I'm aware Jim doesn't have an establishment up there- you are starting to make this seem like a personal crusade. The whole issue raised its head because a bar in phuket DOESN'T have a long term barfine policy at the moment.
Keep out of it? So its my thread and I wants the answers I want to hear and if you don't share them- fuck off. Great attitude Anthony. Maybe you could start a poll on who can answer in which threads.
its clear by your last remarks that you should follow your own words. You don't pay long term bar fines so its not relevant to YOU. kind of makes the last 10 pages moot.
Well I've wasted 5 minutes on this banal subject, enough for today. CYA tomorrow.
#153
Posted 10 September 2011 - 02:09 PM
I dont really understand your question Anthony. Nevertheless it amuses me
A bar-girl or non bar-girl play a different game, right?
When I look at your question from a bar-girl pov I think:
The bar girl is affiliated to, well, a bar, right? The bar-girl agrees with the bar that there is barfine for taking her out of the bar. No? A customer takes out the girl by paying a barfine for good times. So three parties involved right? Bar, bar-girl, customer. Not two, right? Stay with me.
The bar-girls affiliation to a bar is a mutual beneficial relationship, right? And you just can't pause that agreement, right, to the benefit of solely one party? Well, two. As the customer in this case saves money. Now explain to me what is the differene between not paying a barfine for 1 day or 10 days, bearing in mind the affiliation, hence barfine, of the bar-girl to the bar.
I dont get how anyone could ever argue for anything other than a YES objectively looking at the three parties involved: bar, girl, customer. Looking at it simply from a customer pov, sure, nice, no bar fine, more budget for customer. But that is kind of egotistical in the context of the game, no?
But maybe you're taking a bar-girl's pov. But the bar-girl can't just simply decide at her own leisure when to jump in, jump out of that agreement, right? The bar-girl knows the game, she should play by the rules, or get the !@#$ out, no?
In essence what all of those voting NO are creating is a Lose-Win-Win situation, rather then Win-Win-Win. The bar loses, while you and the girl win. For whatever reason. Hmmm.
When I look at your question from a bar-girl pov I think:
Well, there is no question, right? As there is no bar. Hence, no barfine. And that is the essence of the question posed, no?
#154
Posted 10 September 2011 - 05:19 PM
Absolutely, it's also upto May and her customer(s) as to how they wish to run their lives too.Honestly guys, it surely must be up to Karl how he wants to run his bar?
Admittedly, May's once farm-fresh rectal-snap is just a distant memory, but she'll do well wherever she goes, at least for a few more years.
The non-barfine-paying customer has apparenty been banned from Famous.
- His life will never be the same again :|
Meum cerebrum nocet
#155
Posted 10 September 2011 - 06:03 PM
May is a savvy and popular lass who probably knows what she's doing and where her future lies, as she's been a Famous girl for some time and while she's still fairly fresh perhaps a change of backdrop will do her the power of good so all the best to her.
Her well established customer base should not be far behind her.
#156
Posted 10 September 2011 - 06:08 PM
Good answer DC.
May is a savvy and popular lass who probably knows what she's doing and where her future lies, as she's been a Famous girl for some time and while she's still fairly fresh perhaps a change of backdrop will do her the power of good so all the best to her.
Her well established customer base should not be far behind her.
i heard that she will start in C&D next week...
A ladyboy is a kind of creature...that makes a txt saying...dont you trust me...and send it to 20 people...
![]()
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










