Sensations Bar
#73
Posted 15 July 2013 - 06:29 PM
http://www.dpreview....s/post/50398871
Here you can choose what camera you want compere..
http://www.dpreview....canon-eos-6d/15
Canon 6D vs. Nikon D600
http://www.dpreview....6d/19#stilllife
http://www.michaelth...ests-impressive
http://www.dslrfilmn...-light-testing/
http://www.michaelth...o-candle-images
http://www.dpreview....canon-eos-6d/20
"Overall Image Quality
While the EOS 6D may be easily thought of as Canon's 'affordable' full frame DSLR, we're happy to say it gives up nothing in image quality to the powerhouse EOS 5D Mark III. In fact, we actually see better image quality at medium to high ISOs, and noticeably less noise at the highest settings."
But you are right Kendal, my words were poorly placed, i didn't mean that 5D mk 3 does bad job in low light... so i edit original post.
If you want to know more about this subject, search Google with phrase "canon 6D vs. canon 5D mk 3/(nikon d600) HIGH ISO test" and you will find similar result everywhere.
Anyway both Nikon D600/800 and Canon 5D mk 3 are amazing cameras and if you are interested any of these models, you can't go wrong with any of them but you'll get "best what money can buy". And if you already own one, you have every reason to be proud of your camera.
Actually i have Canon's "cheap 50mm F 1,8" but i don't like it's pics. I tried it yesterday in Sensations, but for some reason 24-105 is much sharper. Maybe it needs micro adjust or something. Also color was much worse than with 24-105, all too much red.
Anyway... enough for technical jargon, i don't want that this thread will go "my camera is better than yours..." fight so better we go back to Sensations...
Peace
Ps. More pics to come...
#74
Posted 15 July 2013 - 10:37 PM
I would add that tests are "subjective at best", I've actually seen some unbelievably good results in low light from a pentax camera at the arse end of the rangeLittle bit out topic now but because there seems to be BM's who are interested of technology and photography here is interesting links for high ISO compare with Canon 6D, Canon 5D mk3 and Nikon D600.
http://www.dpreview....s/post/50398871
Here you can choose what camera you want compere..
http://www.dpreview....canon-eos-6d/15
Canon 6D vs. Nikon D600
http://www.dpreview....6d/19#stilllife
http://www.michaelth...ests-impressive
http://www.dslrfilmn...-light-testing/
http://www.michaelth...o-candle-images
http://www.dpreview....canon-eos-6d/20
"Overall Image Quality
While the EOS 6D may be easily thought of as Canon's 'affordable' full frame DSLR, we're happy to say it gives up nothing in image quality to the powerhouse EOS 5D Mark III. In fact, we actually see better image quality at medium to high ISOs, and noticeably less noise at the highest settings."
But you are right Kendal, my words were poorly placed, i didn't mean that 5D mk 3 does bad job in low light... so i edit original post.
If you want to know more about this subject, search Google with phrase "canon 6D vs. canon 5D mk 3/(nikon d600) HIGH ISO test" and you will find similar result everywhere.
Anyway both Nikon D600/800 and Canon 5D mk 3 are amazing cameras and if you are interested any of these models, you can't go wrong with any of them but you'll get "best what money can buy". And if you already own one, you have every reason to be proud of your camera.
Actually i have Canon's "cheap 50mm F 1,8" but i don't like it's pics. I tried it yesterday in Sensations, but for some reason 24-105 is much sharper. Maybe it needs micro adjust or something. Also color was much worse than with 24-105, all too much red.
Anyway... enough for technical jargon, i don't want that this thread will go "my camera is better than yours..." fight so better we go back to Sensations...
Peace
Ps. More pics to come...
I would have thought for portraiture you'd be better of with a 24-70mm F2.8?? not necessarily canon I might add unless you got money to burn!
I wasn't complaining about the pics btw i'm sure any of the girls featured would be very welcome on my lap
#75
Posted 15 July 2013 - 10:38 PM
Attached Files
- jeet70+2 likes this
#76
Posted 15 July 2013 - 10:42 PM
Attached Files
#77
Posted 15 July 2013 - 10:45 PM
Attached Files
#78
Posted 15 July 2013 - 11:05 PM
I would have thought for portraiture you'd be better of with a 24-70mm F2.8?? not necessarily canon I might add unless you got money to burn!
I wasn't complaining about the pics btw i'm sure any of the girls featured would be very welcome on my lap
When i bought this new camera i considered Tamron 24-70mm F2.8 VC which seem to be decent lens (with acceptable price), but in the end i decide that i have more use to bigger focus length that 24-105 offers. I'm very happy about that decision.
It's good to hear that you guys like my pics
#79
Posted 15 July 2013 - 11:17 PM
It's good to hear that you guys like my pics
It is certainly my pleasure to view them
That last one is possibly the best picture of Owe I have ever seen of her, superb Mr.T.
Meum cerebrum nocet
#80
Posted 16 July 2013 - 03:25 AM
Attached Files
#81
Posted 17 July 2013 - 11:02 AM
Thanks for sharing. Hope there are some more on the SD Card.
#82
Posted 17 July 2013 - 10:13 PM
- Torques Hit likes this
#83
Posted 17 July 2013 - 11:52 PM
fon me about 7 years ago fon
-boomdraw
#84
Posted 18 July 2013 - 01:47 AM
I am glad someone understood at least one of mr boomdraws posts todayfon me about 7 years ago fon
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users