loved the picture at the end where the ladyboy was sitting on the top of the seat behind the actor tits out, and cock pulled out and hanging out of the panties.
Reminded me of some times in Casanovas
Movie Review: The Hangover, Part 2. (Filmed in Thailand)
Started by
Surin Nix
, May 27 2011 08:42 PM
105 replies to this topic
#62
yung havok
-
- Members
- 535 posts
Posted 14 June 2011 - 10:59 AM
Unlike the original hangover which gave Vegas a tourism spike I think this movie might have an adverse effect. Especially with the meatheads. A few acquaintances of mine who have seen the film commented that they would never go to Thailand because its crawling with transvestites. One of my buddies was even grilling me about the ladyboys saying "man what the hell do you go to Bangkok for, do you like boys in drag?"
Its funny how so many guys are horrified that they might end up with a ladyboy in their room.
Its funny how so many guys are horrified that they might end up with a ladyboy in their room.
#63
larrylarry
-
- Members
- 472 posts
Posted 07 June 2011 - 03:28 AM
If you want to see the cost of Yaz check on eros.com
If you know the answer, don't be such a twat, just post the price :butterfly:
Make me hunt eros london 1st then the bloody world, save me some time 8)
Cheer's Neo jizz...
Well I had the pleasure about three years ago and she charged me $300.00US for a session. It was an unrushed GFE experience. She looks great in person and was really nice. Worth the $$$
#65
sev7en
-
- Members
- 3,650 posts
Posted 07 June 2011 - 05:27 AM
Yasmine lee at the premire
Damn shes still nice, but no springchicken anymore.
"some see an erotic photo display, me i just hope the hot water soothed her ageing joints."
-boomdraw
-boomdraw
#66
Guest_Vandal_*
Guest_Vandal_*
-
- Guests
Posted 07 June 2011 - 06:45 AM
the film was average at best.
#67
pacman
-
- Members
- 436 posts
Posted 11 June 2011 - 11:59 AM
For all those who have seen The Hangover II, a question - given that this is a comedy, when do I laugh?
How is it possible to have an unlimited budget available to engage the services of the best comedy writers & the best they can come up with is a series of sight gags that are as amusing as a cup of cold vomit. The lead 'dudes' spend most of the movie screaming & carrying on like ADD kindergarten kids on speed.
I so much wanted to enjoy this film that I feel betrayed by all the hype that it is such a load of merde. We all know the story line, the guys all get wasted while having a drink the night before the wedding. They don't know where they are when they wake up, the groom is sporting a Mike Tyson facial tattoo, they have lost the bride's younger brother, a Thai drug dealer is dead in their room & no one knows what happened.
That's about as funny as it gets. It isn't a bad premise to start with, why couldn't they have done something with it? Instead we get the obligatory bad dudes who want something they don't know they have, the compulsory go-go bar scene where they start hyperventilating at the sight of Yasmin's cock, the de rigeur car chase, the cute smoking monkey that should have animal welfare groups up in arms, it just goes from one cliche to the next. Even the bride's father goes from disliking the groom to giving him a big bear hug & welcome all in the space of 24 hours. Wow, who saw that coming?
And Alan, the bearded guy who is euphemistically described as a lovable 'man-child' is nothing more than a nasty, hateful sociopath whose idea of fun is to destroy the dreams of others. This is despite being warned not to do it again. His total lack of judgement indicate a serious case of mental illness. Of course there would be no movie without him.
I really hope there is The Hangover III, where Stu the dentist gets to perform root canals on his "friends" without an anaesthetic. They can scream for half the movie before they all go to a ladyboy bar & get publicly fucked. Now that would be funny & I wouldn't feel quite so ripped off.
How is it possible to have an unlimited budget available to engage the services of the best comedy writers & the best they can come up with is a series of sight gags that are as amusing as a cup of cold vomit. The lead 'dudes' spend most of the movie screaming & carrying on like ADD kindergarten kids on speed.
I so much wanted to enjoy this film that I feel betrayed by all the hype that it is such a load of merde. We all know the story line, the guys all get wasted while having a drink the night before the wedding. They don't know where they are when they wake up, the groom is sporting a Mike Tyson facial tattoo, they have lost the bride's younger brother, a Thai drug dealer is dead in their room & no one knows what happened.
That's about as funny as it gets. It isn't a bad premise to start with, why couldn't they have done something with it? Instead we get the obligatory bad dudes who want something they don't know they have, the compulsory go-go bar scene where they start hyperventilating at the sight of Yasmin's cock, the de rigeur car chase, the cute smoking monkey that should have animal welfare groups up in arms, it just goes from one cliche to the next. Even the bride's father goes from disliking the groom to giving him a big bear hug & welcome all in the space of 24 hours. Wow, who saw that coming?
And Alan, the bearded guy who is euphemistically described as a lovable 'man-child' is nothing more than a nasty, hateful sociopath whose idea of fun is to destroy the dreams of others. This is despite being warned not to do it again. His total lack of judgement indicate a serious case of mental illness. Of course there would be no movie without him.
I really hope there is The Hangover III, where Stu the dentist gets to perform root canals on his "friends" without an anaesthetic. They can scream for half the movie before they all go to a ladyboy bar & get publicly fucked. Now that would be funny & I wouldn't feel quite so ripped off.
#68
Crackerjax
-
- Members
- 1,727 posts
Posted 11 June 2011 - 01:32 PM
So how'd u like the movie Paccers? 
Rule of thumb - sequels suck
Rule of thumb - sequels suck
#69
onetruesaxon
-
- Banned
- 2,281 posts
Posted 11 June 2011 - 05:45 PM
Did you ask for your money back at the end of the film ?For all those who have seen The Hangover II, a question - given that this is a comedy, when do I laugh?
How is it possible to have an unlimited budget available to engage the services of the best comedy writers & the best they can come up with is a series of sight gags that are as amusing as a cup of cold vomit. The lead 'dudes' spend most of the movie screaming & carrying on like ADD kindergarten kids on speed.
I so much wanted to enjoy this film that I feel betrayed by all the hype that it is such a load of merde. We all know the story line, the guys all get wasted while having a drink the night before the wedding. They don't know where they are when they wake up, the groom is sporting a Mike Tyson facial tattoo, they have lost the bride's younger brother, a Thai drug dealer is dead in their room & no one knows what happened.
That's about as funny as it gets. It isn't a bad premise to start with, why couldn't they have done something with it? Instead we get the obligatory bad dudes who want something they don't know they have, the compulsory go-go bar scene where they start hyperventilating at the sight of Yasmin's cock, the de rigeur car chase, the cute smoking monkey that should have animal welfare groups up in arms, it just goes from one cliche to the next. Even the bride's father goes from disliking the groom to giving him a big bear hug & welcome all in the space of 24 hours. Wow, who saw that coming?
And Alan, the bearded guy who is euphemistically described as a lovable 'man-child' is nothing more than a nasty, hateful sociopath whose idea of fun is to destroy the dreams of others. This is despite being warned not to do it again. His total lack of judgement indicate a serious case of mental illness. Of course there would be no movie without him.
I really hope there is The Hangover III, where Stu the dentist gets to perform root canals on his "friends" without an anaesthetic. They can scream for half the movie before they all go to a ladyboy bar & get publicly fucked. Now that would be funny & I wouldn't feel quite so ripped off.
#70
pacman
-
- Members
- 436 posts
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:44 AM
No I didn't but at $18 for the ticket, I can think how I could have better spent it.
And furthermore, this movie has taken a record amount at the box office for a Memorial Day weekend in the USA. What does that say about the public consciousness? Is this what we can expect from now on as the standard for big screen comedies? And the film has an R rating in the US yet it is still a puerile load of drivel.
I noted that a famous Australian film reviewer commented that the young audience he shared his screening with were amused the most by the bits he found the least funny. I had exactly the same experience. What does that suggest? That the younger audience's view of comedy has become so distorted they can no longer tell what's funny any more?
The subject matter of drunken tourists running into ladyboys in a Bangkok bar is so rich in comedic potential that if anyone is planning to make a movie on the subject, count me in.
And furthermore, this movie has taken a record amount at the box office for a Memorial Day weekend in the USA. What does that say about the public consciousness? Is this what we can expect from now on as the standard for big screen comedies? And the film has an R rating in the US yet it is still a puerile load of drivel.
I noted that a famous Australian film reviewer commented that the young audience he shared his screening with were amused the most by the bits he found the least funny. I had exactly the same experience. What does that suggest? That the younger audience's view of comedy has become so distorted they can no longer tell what's funny any more?
The subject matter of drunken tourists running into ladyboys in a Bangkok bar is so rich in comedic potential that if anyone is planning to make a movie on the subject, count me in.
#71
stonefre
-
- Members
- 1,052 posts
Posted 12 June 2011 - 10:55 AM
No I didn't but at $18 for the ticket, I can think how I could have better spent it.
And furthermore, this movie has taken a record amount at the box office for a Memorial Day weekend in the USA. What does that say about the public consciousness? Is this what we can expect from now on as the standard for big screen comedies? And the film has an R rating in the US yet it is still a puerile load of drivel.
Well you went to see it, so how does that make them any different from you?
#72
dixon cox
-
- Moderators
-
- 7,150 posts
Monkey Nut
- LocationCentral Pattaya
Posted 12 June 2011 - 12:43 PM
A perfect retortNo I didn't but at $18 for the ticket, I can think how I could have better spent it.
And furthermore, this movie has taken a record amount at the box office for a Memorial Day weekend in the USA. What does that say about the public consciousness? Is this what we can expect from now on as the standard for big screen comedies? And the film has an R rating in the US yet it is still a puerile load of drivel.
Well you went to see it, so how does that make them any different from you?
Meum cerebrum nocet
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
