166 replies to this topic

[petesie]

I agree that a "Trusted Members" area would be a good place to post more explicit pics for viewing by BM's who qualify for this exemption..................

I think you would also require the BM's who wish to be considered for access priviledges to this area to sign an additional disclaimer that clearly states that nothing from this area leaves it............and perhaps also mention that you find a pic of your "Teerak" in there.............tough titty..................

[farangbah]

This topic of the girls complaining about their pic being shown on the internet without their permission is the subject of several threads on the other forum at the moment.

How do you think BH got the idea to resurrect this year-old thread all of a sudden?

[khunjohn]

Does this information stays attached if you remove Properties and Personal Information in picture details?

BR

There certainly are tools to remove the metadata from pictures since people can't see the metadata they likely won't remember to remove it before passing on the photo.

[khunjohn]

I agree that a "Trusted Members" area would be a good place to post more explicit pics for viewing by BM's who qualify for this exemption..................

:

Who are the people how know the most LBs, some on a real personal basis, and who may be sponsoning some LBs (or at least helping them out outside the P2P).

Why the same people who have enough activity to qualify as Trusted Members.

So are the Trusted Members the last pepole you should trust?

[boarhog]

This topic of the girls complaining about their pic being shown on the internet without their permission is the subject of several threads on the other forum at the moment.

How do you think BH got the idea to resurrect this year-old thread all of a sudden?

All of a sudden?
Farangbah, I suggest you take a look at this thread.
http://lb-69.com/for...973.html#120973


I know its hard to conceive that I would have an idea or thought of my own. Beleive it or not (I don't care) I have not seen these threads you speak about on your beloved forum.

[farangbah]

Sorry, I meant "yesterday." (You know I love you, T-Bone!)

But this topic is starting to feel like the Japanese with H1N1 . . .

[petesie]

Who are the people how know the most LBs, some on a real personal basis, and who may be sponsoning some LBs (or at least helping them out outside the P2P).

Why the same people who have enough activity to qualify as Trusted Members.

So are the Trusted Members the last pepole you should trust?[/quote]

Had you been drinking then John............... ?

[boarhog]

So replacing all of sudden with yesterday makes it different? I'll spell it out for you. Bullseyemaco brought up the subject on his TR thread about a ladyboy upset over his photos being shown to her. This was on his thread on THIS forum. This topic was carried over here to an existing thread that I resurrected so we didn't end Bullys thread with this emotionally charged subject.

As you can see farangbah its nothing new. In fact its been around for quite while. Its been addressed a couple times, thats why I didn't want to start a whole new thread. This way people would be able to look back through responses when its come up before. More importantly it would be a long aftermath of Bully's report.

Since you bring up that other forum. A forum member there "Paradise Juggler" actually stated he was showing ladyboys photos I took of them and they were mad about it. He went on to say him and they would be waiting for me on my next trip. I'm not cool with people making threats, especially over the internet and a forum. I seriously doubt the a-hole would even show his face if I went. However I'm quite sure he sought his hero status by showing some of those their photos.

Did this upset me? Sure. Did it upset the LB's? I'm sure it did even though photos were conscensual. How are they supposed to react when some idiot brings them photos? Oh Karpen Ka I fuck you for free? What did he get from it....oh he's their friend now. He needed this to become their friend. the thing that disturbed me the most about the hero was that the forum itself didn't lean on his ass. He even got abusive and could have easily been banned. He wasn't and BM's gave him a pass. They didn't want to get involved and left me alone with this battle against the hero. A few got on him for his abuse but no one else really came out and told him how fucked that was going to the girls.

I hope these white knights see the repercussions. We hear guys saying its why they don't post photos any longer or trip reports even. We hear the talk of limiting forums to certain level of membership which sucks for the casual user who doesn't post a lot or the newbie who is trying to go to LOS his first time. The hero's showing of photos not only upsets them, but now they may be reluctant to pose at all. This won't help them a bit financially, so in essence the hero is taking money out of their pocket. They in fact are the most detrimental to the forums as we know them or knew them to be.

[email]

he was showing ladyboys photos I took of them and they were mad about it.

Do you actually ask permission to the ladies for posting nude or semi nude pictures on the net? If not, don't blame the ladyboy for being angry about it. Afterall, how would you feel if a fellow BM captures you on camera in a LB bar and posts these pictures on the net without blocking out your face? I'd be, rightfully, mad about it.

[boarhog]

Its a valid question Email and although I don't ask for there expressed written consent for posting any photos of them I talk to them about taking photos. This usually happens in the bar before the bedroom. In the bedroom its their call on what they are comfortable with. I'm not about to say I would like to post this on an internet forum for a bunch of ladyboy lovers.

I don't get angry at all over them choosing to pose what they are comfortable with.

I was new to forums a little over a year ago. I posted some photos i took from 2 years prior. They were explicit and ofcourse i had no idea I would eventually post them on a site, as I didn't know sites like this existed. Anyway a bunch of guys on this other forum got all bent. Some said she had a boyfriend and this and that. Well eventually the guy on the site asked her if she wanted them removed and she said no I don't care. Even knowing the graphic context. Her boyfriend even posted that he knew what she did prior to meeting her and he didn't care, but asked me to change my avatar that featured her. He was much cooler about it than all these righteous blokes who wanted to attack me over it.

I'll admit I have posted some photos I regret, but thats the learning curve I personally have gone through. I have also posted photos of a ladyboy who has many graphic photos of me as well. She could post them just as easily as I have her. We never discussed it. I don't blame them at all for being angry or upset. how are they supposed to react when some hero shows them a photo inthe context of they should be upset? It leaves them no choice. What does the farang say to them...look at these photos some bad man posted on the internet for everyone to see.

Lets use Gus for example. no one really knew of her, a great find by Bully, and his shots of her ampe cock draws a ton of interest in her or her cock. So now she all of sudden has customers looking for her because of the photos. She also has a guy bringing her attention to the photos like they are damaging to her.

I ask you are they? to me they helped her maximise her earning potential. Should she be angry....no being angry isnt going to change anything. She can choose to never pose again if it does bother her. Hopefully she realises it could effect her negatively by doing this.
If we stop posting their photos which they pose for what are the heros or white knights going to have to show them? Will they show them a report on how she rimmed the guys ass for hours before he came in her mouth? Where do these heros stop? should a forum like this just be PG13? Do we have to adjust the security levels so only an elite few can see these type of photos?

Do we need to get signed waiver forms? Is it unrealistic of me to say they should only pose for what they are willing to show?

[khunjohn]

I could go out on weekends and play football with my friends. While that technically makes me a football player, from a practical sense I'm not a football player. I'm a doctor or lawyer (or whatever it is that I do) who happens to play football sometimes.

We all heard guys say that all the bargirls in Thailand are whores. While technically corrrect this is again incorrrect from a practical viewpoint.

For some girls prosittution is their profession and they are determined to maximize their income while they can. For many though they are drawn by the glamor,the guy treating them like they're special, and the hope of a long term relationship with someone who can take care of them. They basically are just 'passing thorugh'.

Now it's been pointed out in this thread that publishing a picture on a Forum is great publicity. It can propel an unknown to stardom. But it's stardom in the whore profession.

The reaction of a girl to knowing her compromising pictures are out there is a function of how she views herself. If she sees herself as a whore then she'll be happy about it. Free publicity is great publicity. But if she sees herself as a 'good girl' who is only doing what she has to at this moment to get by but hopes to put this all behind her at some point then she's not going to welcome any pictures that imply that she's a prostitute.