166 replies to this topic

[boarhog]

Okay, I learned my lesson, but its really hard to take you serious in those glasses.

[dixon cox]

... but its really hard to take you serious in those glasses.

Maybe something more festive

[boarhog]

Ah, you had that one waiting in the wings. Well done. Although I think Kliome inspired your seasoning up before I spoke.

[dixon cox]

Ah, you had that one waiting in the wings. Well done. Although I think Kliome inspired your seasoning up before I spoke.

It was one I'd made earlier, I have lots with both subtle and non-subtle changes, but you and kliome inspired me to finally post the festive ones.

As it happens, I've been putting up ones with subtle differences and expressions for while, but perhaps too subtle to be noticed :|

[Crackerjax]

Just back from a trip where I had no internet access and wading through the posts I missed when I stumbled upon this. To be honest, the thread is very very boaring after awhile but I forced myself to slog thru it given it related directly to me. I must say that in my case I was not trying to be a "white knight", a "hero", to upset anyone, or blow smoke up anyone's ass. Nor was I in search of any particular girl that had featured in anyone's TR. It was a normal night's mongering in Patong and when the girl in question introduced herself to me in Soi Croc I merely told her that I actually knew her name already as she was an internet sensation.

Hmmmm, maybe I WAS trying to charm her with some smoke up her ass....

As if THAT was what it was going to take to get her back to my loom.

The next day I was surfing on the laptop for mental stimulation as one does after satisfying one's carnal needs when the sleeping beauty got up and asked to see her pics. I really thought nothing of it - they showed her beautifully - and if I recall it wasn't her that complained. In fact, maybe Pentire should re-post them.

So Boardhog, in this instance you neglected to consider the all important "None of the Above" button in your rather tiresome over-analysis.

That said, I won't be showing the Forum to any future dates.

[boarhog]

Hmmmm, maybe I WAS trying to charm her with some smoke up her ass....

As if THAT was what it was going to take to get her back to my loom.

The next day I was surfing on the laptop for mental stimulation as one does after satisfying one's carnal needs when the sleeping beauty got up and asked to see her pics. I really thought nothing of it - they showed her beautifully - and if I recall it wasn't her that complained. In fact, maybe Pentire should re-post them.
So Boardhog, in this instance you neglected to consider the all important "None of the Above" button in your rather tiresome over-analysis.
That said, I won't be showing the Forum to any future dates.

I can imagine that you would have hoped this subject would have gone away. Your obviously taking it personally. However, its not really about you in as much its about, Bullseyemaco recent dealings with an angry lb who was shown photos.
I'm sure it is a tiresome subject for you being that you were implicated in this sort of thing back in Patong. As for the none of the above button, I don't think thats the case. I'm pretty sure I described the accidental telling LB's of photos on internet in my "Overanalysis" However I never singled you out.

I don't think its wise or cool to be showing or alerting any LB of any photos on the internet. Yes even if they are photos on paid sites, it probably doesn't impress them that someone has not only seen them, but telling them about them. They already know they have posed for these. I'm pretty sure they prefer customer to sit down with them and take them because they like them, not because they saw them on the internet.

I think we are all happy to hear you won't be showing any more LB's the forum. Its probably a good idea for all not to make any references to the internet or telling them they saw them on the internet.

[Crackerjax]

I don't have a problem with you resurrecting this thread. I'm not taking it personally either as you did not attack me in anyway. I just think you often tend to go on and on and on and over think things which tends to detract from your otherwise enthusiastic contributions here.

And it wasn't "accidental" that I told her I already knew her name, it was just a passing comment. Really of no more import than "I like your shoes" - (Make sure to leave them on when I'm behind you munching on your ass)

Ladyboys are a VERY pleasant diversion for me but they're just another kind of strange which I love to get my rocks off to. Sorry to admit that I'm just a shallow cocks-in-frocks mongerer, but not a whole lot of complicated motives and psychology in my dealings with them.

"None of the Above"

[Metropolis]

Who cares. They're all auto-resized anyway so it's not like it matters.

[boarhog]

It would appear that I am to blame for Pentire having to take down the Patong pics.

I remarked to one of my dates in Phuket upon her introducing herself to me that I in fact knew her name and face having previously seen her on the internet. Didn't seem to be a problem and she happily accompanied me home for the evening. The next afternoon, in response to her question as to whether the photos I had seen of her were "on the bed" , I stupidly showed this girl her pic(s) in Pentire's report. Again, she didn't seem to have any problem with the pics in question - indeed, such were their quality, Pentire should be working as her publicist. But apparently she told someone else, who told someone else....

I have already apologized to Pentire separately, but want to make it clear here to the rest of the BM's that this was not a case of a jealous sponsor or some other complicated agenda. Just a simple mistake on my part, forgetting that when it comes to gossip - ladyboys truly are girls.

Sorry all, but especially to Pentire should this little incident in fact cause him to cancel his return to Phuket over Christmas. I hope that things will calm down and that he will reconsider.

Mea maxima culpa

and you're cracking on people for spelling mistakes? Thats beautiful.

[fridgemagnet]

If a picture is posted by a BM and it turns out that it causes problems in the future for him, then I have zero sympathy for the poster... none.

Everything you post in the open forum is accessible, either freely or by having a valid username to log in with, you can't pick & choose which demographic gets to view your pictures.

The responsibilty always lies with the poster, it's pathetic to even consider blaming anyone else.

Well Kaiser Stogie (the owner of another, different, forum) recons all pics belong to him, so all responsibility must also lie with that forum owner, and not with the poster (who looses all control of the pics once theyr'e posted).
However, I'm inclined towards your diametrically opposed point of view, and also towards this forum, where different rules apply.