To all the guys interested in femboys why not just take your last stride and make the hop over the fence? I mean I personally and most guys would agree that attraction to femboys is clearly a homosexual attraction (not that I have anything against that, nor should others). Keep in mind they are "Feminine boys," nothing "Lady" about them. What gets me is there is too many of these forums, ladyboy sites, bars, clubs, etc that mix these femboys, or should I say dudes or guys with ladyboys. Seems like the dudes from Sunni are coming into ladyboy territory and dancing in the clubs, bars of all of Thailand. What a buzz kill when you go to a ladyboy bar or venue, and you see or have to look at these blokes that try to be ladyboys, but are just men doing their best ladyboy imitation. Its a great shame that this happens, as a lot will agree with me because femboys is a whole different liking and/or ballgame. The guys that play this ballgame are obviously switch hitters (at the very minimum bisexual if they also like girls and/or ladyboys too). Again, nothing against anyone, but there should be a whole new department for this, not time and time again mixed in with ladyboy business.
Guys interested in femboys
#2
-
- Members
- 49 posts
Posted 22 February 2014 - 08:05 PM
Ladyboys have to start somewhere. Before the hormones kick in and they can afford breast augmentation surgery, some will look more masculine than others. It would be quite unfair to exclude them from the bars.
Although I am not attracted to the ones with a five o'clock shadow and without the slightest sign of hormone therapy, a major decider is how feminine she behaves in all the small ways, from her walk and body language to the Hello Kitty stickers on her phone (and I don't mean just an exaggerated sway of the hips and "female" hand waving).
I have seen photos of Western TS who look like men off the street stuffed into a bikini and heels. Fortunately this is much rarer in Thailand.
- scottieM likes this
#3
-
- Members
- 18 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 01:38 AM
Listen femboys are boys that are guys, and most don't go on to be full ladyboys. Ladyboys are completely different, and your theory of ladyboys have to start somewhere is way out of line. All ladyboys were born male, does that mean ladyboy lovers would have like the ladyboy when they were a complete natural guy? Only guys that are gay would have, and same goes for femboy lovers. Engage in faggotry all anyone wants, but just don't involve it into the circle of ladyboys. I am sure most have same stance.
#4
-
- Members
- 9,813 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 02:43 AM
So you're calling us "fagguts" if we go with a femboy (i.e. no tits)?
Get a grip fella!
Waldorf_and_Statler_2.JPG 41.73KB
12 downloads
#5
-
- Members
- 18 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 02:55 AM
Jimbo, yes no matter what you like to call them, "femboys." "no tits" "crossdressers" at the end of the day and in the ST or LT room/bed/hotel they are not ladyboys or GG's, but they are straight up guys. I don't know any other way to put it, and again. I have nothing again gays, but it is faggotry and should be completely separated from the LB world.
#6
-
- Members
- 1,104 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:05 AM
Jimbo, yes no matter what you like to call them, "femboys." "no tits" "crossdressers" at the end of the day and in the ST or LT room/bed/hotel they are not ladyboys or GG's, but they are straight up guys. I don't know any other way to put it, and again. I have nothing again gays, but it is faggotry and should be completely separated from the LB world.
You are okay with sucking cock as long as there are a pair of breast implants involved?
That's hilarious! Nice troll, dude.
I thought you were serious until you started calling for segregation.
- scottieM likes this
#7
-
- Moderators
-
- 7,150 posts
Monkey Nut
- LocationCentral Pattaya
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:05 AM
Without a doubt this topic ranks as the most tedious and tiresome subject within our world.
No doubt every newbie goes through a phase of feeling the need to label everyone and everything in it. Once you've compiled your worthless little list I'm sure there'll be no shortage of suggestions of where you can shove it.
- larrylarry, Fellanic, RobiSLO and 3 others like this
Meum cerebrum nocet
#8
-
- Moderators
-
- 3,343 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:06 AM
sorry craigbarot - you are entitled to your opinion - but that is all it is. If you say an lb isn't an lb until she has breasts, how would describe Nancy from La Bamba in her early days? I don't think calling her a fag boy at that stage is correct either, because she is an lb.
Early days:
Now:
So according to you, if someone likes Nancy in her early days, he's a "faggot", but he's not if he likes her now?
I think there's something amiss with your opinion.
- anicon, jaybee111 and Spyder Rocket like this
#9
-
- Members
- 9,813 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:06 AM
Jimbo, yes no matter what you like to call them, "femboys." "no tits" "crossdressers" at the end of the day and in the ST or LT room/bed/hotel they are not ladyboys or GG's, but they are straight up guys. I don't know any other way to put it, and again. I have nothing again gays, but it is faggotry and should be completely separated from the LB world.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
- strobriand likes this
#10
-
- Members
- 1,104 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:07 AM
Without a doubt this topic ranks as the most tedious and tiresome subject within our world.
No doubt every newbie goes through a phase of feeling the need to label everyone and everything in it. Once you've compiled your worthless little list I'm sure there'll be no shortage of suggestions of where you can shove it.
I'm beginning to understand the aversion for this topic.
#11
-
- Members
- 1,104 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:10 AM
sorry craigbarot - you are entitled to your opinion - but that is all it is. If you say an lb isn't an lb until she has breasts, how would describe Nancy from La Bamba in her early days? I don't think calling her a fag boy at that stage is correct either, because she is an lb.
Early days:
So according to you, if someone likes Nancy in her early days, he's a "faggot", but he's not if he likes her now?
I think there's something amiss with your opinion.
Call me a faggot all you want, I loved the way young Nancy looked.
#12
-
- Members
- 18 posts
Posted 23 February 2014 - 03:15 AM
Its ok guys nothing wrong with being a closet gay. We are not talking about just tits here, Don't try to use that as a defense to femboys and being straight. I have seen GG"s with small or not tits, but they are still obviously girls. We all know a guy when we see one, whether you want to call him a twink or femboy. Also, no matter what you do with LB (even sucking cock) or GG is not faggotry because at least you are not doing it with a guy, I mean femboy or twink as some closeted individuals like to call them.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users
