21 replies to this topic

[petesie]

While it's always a thrill to see a fine weapon of ass destruction a small medium stiffie is preferred then I can relax into it and enjoy getting a good old seeing to...

[fanihi]

Love um big and hard. Had the pleasure of Nancy in Pattaya my last two visits so now I am searching for the long lost sisters [oops brothers] of Mint AND Nancy!!

[dixon cox]

I would imagine the guys who like big hard cocks are the ones that like it up their arse, but they're not gay, of course.

It doesn't really bother me if she can't achieve a full erection if I like the girl as it can be the price paid for her being on hormones, yet she has softer and more feminine skin and little breasts to compensate. I'm not that keen on big silicon titays either.

Obviously I'd prefer if they can achieve an erection, for oral purposes, but the girls that usually appeal to me are true ladyboys anyway, which means purely bottom. Their size is also irrelevant, but small is sweet.

[goodenough]

I would imagine the guys who like big hard cocks are the ones that like it up their arse, but they're not gay, of course.

It doesn't really bother me if she can't achieve a full erection if I like the girl as it can be the price paid for her being on hormones, yet she has softer and more feminine skin and little breasts to compensate. I'm not that keen on big silicon titays either.

Obviously I'd prefer if they can achieve an erection, for oral purposes, but the girls that usually appeal to me are true ladyboys anyway, which means purely bottom. Their size is also irrelevant, but small is sweet.

And of course neither is people who like to suck cook, big or "sweet" small ones, gay

[bob7277]

I was going to start a similar thread until I found this one, so I thought I could revive it instead.   I do love ladyboys with limp cocks, especially small cocks.   Those ladyboys simply look much more feminine to me, more passive, even submissive which is very arousing to me.   I am a top, and have no use for a big, erected cock.  And very few women enjoy being fucked in the ass, or they tolerate it but you have to take care of her vagina at the same time.   With a ladyboy there is no vagina, you can concentrate on the ass as much as you want without having any worry or feeling any guilt.   And seeing her little cute limp cock swing around, or grabbing and pulling on it while I fuck her is priceless.   I have been lucky enough to always meet at least one limp-cock ladyboy every time I go to Thailand but it's not easy as very few guys like them, they are not advertised as much, it's a lot of trial and error.  Once I find one, I stick to her for a few days.   I also love long foreskins but that would be for another thread maybe... :-)

[rxpharm]

Just about as rare as post op lovers! Let's see how the discussion continues on, and if limp lb lovers are as rare as you think!

[Skyblue]

Ummmm....

 

Strikes me as odd on a forum like this that that comments over who is the "gayer" would be any kind of issue. I am not opposed to differences of opinion but find us calling each other names is somewhat churlish, ie "I would imagine the guys who like big hard cocks are the ones that like it up their arse, but they're not gay, of course" is a very unmerited debate indeed.

 

To me sex is sex in its many forms & is it any worse from the perspective of the average ignoramus whether you & I are in their eyes regardless of how we may choose to dress it up "'Fucking a man up the arse or being fucked by one" (this includes sucking cock, which to be fair is not considered a very "Manly" pursuit amosgst the less enlightened) These people will never understand that whilst these girls are to a degree anatomically male there soul is 100% female. If you want that sort of close minded  nonsense then go to Pattaya Addicts (fetish section) & see some of the vitriolic rubbish attacking anyone who even looks sideways at a ladyboy.

 

Whilst we don't have to all agree on everything, it is kind of us against the world. We are not a large community & there is enough bigotry against people like ourselves who make the choices we do without promoting it in our own forum. I am not having a go at anyone despite the quote above but feel we can do better than this.

[Spyder Rocket]

Ummmm....

Strikes me as odd on a forum like this that that comments over who is the "gayer" would be any kind of issue. I am not opposed to differences of opinion but find us calling each other names is somewhat churlish, ie "I would imagine the guys who like big hard cocks are the ones that like it up their arse, but they're not gay, of course" is a very unmerited debate indeed.

To me sex is sex in its many forms & is it any worse from the perspective of the average ignoramus whether you & I are in their eyes regardless of how we may choose to dress it up "'Fucking a man up the arse or being fucked by one" (this includes sucking cock, which to be fair is not considered a very "Manly" pursuit amosgst the less enlightened) These people will never understand that whilst these girls are to a degree anatomically male there soul is 100% female. If you want that sort of close minded nonsense then go to Pattaya Addicts (fetish section) & see some of the vitriolic rubbish attacking anyone who even looks sideways at a ladyboy.

Whilst we don't have to all agree on everything, it is kind of us against the world. We are not a large community & there is enough bigotry against people like ourselves who make the choices we do without promoting it in our own forum. I am not having a go at anyone despite the quote above but feel we can do better than this.

There might have been an element of "inside humor" in those old posts that was lost on you. While I agree that the exchange between DC and goodenough could seem churlish, I'm very confident that it wasn't mean spirited.

There is an ongoing narrative on this forum about sexuality, and how LB lovers view themselves on the spectrum of gay, straight, or bi.

There are numerous views on this, and it sometimes becomes a topic of lively debate, but for the most part it is good natured, albeit rather graphic and crude at times.

PS

Churlish is an excellent vocabulary word, it isn't often that I have to hit the dictionary, but I did today.

I intend on using that word whenever the opportunity arises.

[veveron]

Interesting post to revive.

 

Whether we click is the important thing, but sometimes I start by asking if they can top. The reason is ladyboys will, sometimes, tell you anything to get taken.  Then if they say "can not" I'm interested. Those who "can do anything" sometimes playfully try to top at some point.  Chocolate was one of those I made that mistake with before. Beautiful and nice girl, but kept trying to top, kind of broke the mood.

 

Didn't think about it before but small and limp is fine, maybe better, I would think more comfortable for them when face down flat. Like others said more feminine and submissive.

[Skyblue]

Fair call Spyder Rocket,

 

If I have missed some inside humour or mistaken someones intent then I am only to happy to admit my mistake. My real point is that we are in most cases here on our own & whilst I respect healthy debate name calling amongst one another does little to encourage it. 

 

Were all different & thats half the appeal of this forum so I hope rather than divide us it brings us closer together as a community that is trying to find its feet & some form of acceptance amongst the narrow minded & bigoted idiots on the periphery as per Surin Nix's post "I am pissed" For the record I am with SR on this & think a dammed good arse kicking would have been an appropriate response to these uncultured imbeciles. Still TIT & its probably not worth the hassle that is sure to follow. I dont doubt non of us have the time or patience to "teach fish to climb trees"